Author summary
36%1 analyzed article/video758 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ashley Capoot results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 53% (4,132 of 8,706 authors). This Ashley Capoot is worse (more manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Ashley Capoot
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
53%Ashley Capoot (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,032
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510052.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.1%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.6%Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos