Speaker summary
66% 8 analyzed articles/videos 346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Randy Fine results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.5% saturation with 165.577 hits . Analysis detected 853.664 faulty-reasoning hits from 346 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (40,279 of 45,124 speakers). This Randy Fine is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Randy Fine
Speaker details
Total words: 346
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 9.1% BS Score8 analyzed videos346 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 42.5% 42.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 23.0% 23.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst