Speaker summary
62% 12 analyzed articles/videos 1,618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pete Buttigieg results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Loss Aversion , and Unattributed Quote , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 315.876 hits . Analysis detected 2,862.263 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,618 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 2% (41,860 of 42,608 speakers). This Pete Buttigieg is better (less manipulative) than 98.20% of the peer group. Pete Buttigieg
Speaker details
Total words: 1,618
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.8% percentile 4.0% BS Score12 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 11.0% 11.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.9% 12.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 11.0%, sitewide 2.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst