Speaker summary
48% 88 analyzed articles/videos 1,842.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pentagon results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Unattributed Quote , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 329 hits . Analysis detected 3,101.826 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,842.333 analyzed words across 88 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,436 of 44,797 speakers). This Pentagon is better (less manipulative) than 99.20% of the peer group. Pentagon
Speaker details
Total words: 1,842.333
Content count: 88
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score88 analyzed videos1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 2.0% 2.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.7% 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst