Speaker summary
67% 15 analyzed articles/videos 1,954.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Lawler results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Status Quo Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 381.446 hits . Analysis detected 3,589.91 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,954.667 analyzed words across 15 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,700 of 45,429 speakers). This Mike Lawler is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Mike Lawler
Speaker details
Total words: 1,954.667
Content count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score15 analyzed videos2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Straw Man: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst