Author summary
59%5 analyzed articles/videos3,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ariana Figueroa results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 1,660 hits. Analysis detected 9,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,760 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 32% (6,446 of 9,471 authors). This Ariana Figueroa is better (less manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Ariana Figueroa
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
32%Ariana Figueroa (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,760
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

32% percentile
025507510031.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 12.1%12.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate