Speaker summary
65% 11 analyzed articles/videos 643.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike DeWine results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 42.7% saturation with 311.045 hits . Analysis detected 1,408.332 faulty-reasoning hits from 643.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of 9% (37,086 of 40,361 speakers). This Mike DeWine is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Mike DeWine
Speaker details
Total words: 643.667
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 7.9% BS Score11 analyzed videos643.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 42.7% 42.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 11.9% 11.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 17.4% 17.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.7%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst