Speaker summary
74% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,043.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Alvarez results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 482 hits . Analysis detected 2,549.829 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,043.667 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 6% (41,313 of 43,769 speakers). This Danielle Alvarez is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Danielle Alvarez
Speaker details
Total words: 1,043.667
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 6.5% BS Score13 analyzed videos1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 28.9% 28.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 20.0% 20.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 13.3% 13.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Straw Man: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.2% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst