Publication summary
95% 46 analyzed articles/videos 24,809 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Daily Beast results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.1% saturation with 21,439 hits . Analysis detected 135,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 106,735 analyzed words across 46 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 75% (148 of 584 publications). This The Daily Beast is worse (more manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 106,735
Article count: 46
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.8% percentile 2.4% BS Score46 analyzed articles106.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.9% 10.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 20.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 18.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst