Author summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 959 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Furr results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 438 hits . Analysis detected 5,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,836 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,904 of 9,396 authors). This Amy Furr is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Amy Furr
Author details
Total words: 3,836
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.4% 11.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.7% 9.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.9%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst