Speaker summary
â 65% 24 analyzed articles/videos 2,163.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Grassley results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Indoctrination , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 454 hits . Analysis detected 4,343.951 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,163.333 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of â 2% (40,859 of 41,667 speakers). This Chuck Grassley is better (less manipulative) than 98.10% of the peer group. Chuck Grassley
Speaker details
Total words: 2,163.333
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.9% percentile 4.2% BS Score24 analyzed videos2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.1% 8.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 17.0% 17.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.8% 7.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 5.6% 5.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Tu Quoque: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst