Todd Blanche’s nomination for attorney general clears critical hurdle after deal with GOP holdouts 20%

By Associated Press74%

8/4/2026, 4:42:10 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Appeal to Emotion, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 187 hits. Analysis detected 1,072 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,073 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 27.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (23,542 of 29,314 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.30% of the article peer group.

By ALANNA DURKIN RICHER and MARY CLARE JALONICK 
WASHINGTON (AP)  Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche cleared a critical hurdle Tuesday in his bid to be confirmed to the post after swaying Republican holdouts on a Senate committee to advance his nomination for a floor vote. 
The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 12-10 along party lines in support of the nomination of President Donald Trump’s former personal attorney, who has aggressively pushed the Republican administration’s priorities since taking over from Pam Bondi in April. 
The vote followed a deal struck late Sunday between Blanche and two Republican senators  John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina  who had been threatening to block his confirmation over the settlement of Trump’s lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service regarding the president’s leaked tax returns. 
Cornyn and Tillis backed Blanche’s nomination after the Justice Department confirmed in writing that it wasn’t moving forward with a $1.8 billion fund to compensate Trump allies who believe they were prosecuted for political purposes, which the administration announced as part of the settlement. 
After days of negotiations, Blanche issued an order Sunday evening confirming “beyond any doubt, that there is no Fund.” 
It was still unclear, though, if Republicans will have enough votes in the full Senate to confirm Blanche. 
A vote could come by the end of the week. 
If all Democrats oppose him, Blanche can only afford to lose two Republican votes if Sen. 
Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who was hospitalized after a fall, does not return before then. 
Maine Sen. 
Susan Collins, a moderate Republican who is in a tough reelection race this year, said in a statement Tuesday afternoon that she would not support Blanche because he has taken actions that “eroded the department’s independence,” including the creation of the settlement fund. 
At least two other Republican senators have not said if they will vote to confirm Blanche  Alaska Sen. 
Lisa Murkowski and Louisiana Sen. 
Bill Cassidy, who lost reelection earlier this year when Trump endorsed one of his primary opponents. 
Both declined comment when asked how they will vote. 
Democrats complain about the fund 
Democrats say Blanche’s order doesn’t go far enough to prevent the Trump administration from reviving the fund after the acting attorney general’s confirmation and have called for legislation to permanently bar it. 
The order also doesn’t stop the administration from compensating Trump allies  including people who attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021  through a previously established process that allows people to file claims for damages if they believed they were wronged by the government. 
The fund “can easily be revived with a new order from the Department of Justice 15 minutes after Mr. 
Blanche is confirmed as attorney general,” said Dick Durbin of Illinois, the top Democrat on the committee. 
Cornyn and Tillis had also pressed for clarification on a separate part of the settlement that would grant Trump and members of his family immunity from tax audits. 
Under the deal, the Justice Department clarified in writing that the tax audit immunity agreement applies only to claims open at the time of the settlement and does not protect Trump from examination of future tax filings. 
It also makes clear that only the parties that brought the lawsuit  Trump, two of his sons, and the Trump Organization  are covered by the tax agreement. 
Cornyn said his reasons for backing Blanche go beyond the deal struck Sunday, adding that he believes the Justice Department needs a “stabilizing force” at the helm. 
“The Department of Justice does not need a temporary, unconfirmed nominee as our nation’s top law enforcement official. 
Trump needs someone in this role, as well, with a strong legal mind,” Cornyn said. 
Blanche’s independence has been called into question 
Blanche has faced intense scrutiny regarding his ability to maintain independence from the White House, the Justice Department’s pursuit of the president’s political foes and the agency’s handling of files related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking investigation. 
But it was the settlement of Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS that threatened to derail Blanche’s nomination, forcing a delay in the committee vote last week amid pressure from the two Republican senators, who are not returning to Capitol Hill after their terms end in January. 
Republican Sen. 
Chuck Grassley, who chairs the committee, said Tillis and Cornyn’s demands were “common sense.” 
Grassley said the senators’ concerns about the “Anti-Weaponization Fund” and the IRS settlement were shared by many other lawmakers, including himself. 
“I’m grateful that they as well as Mr. 
Blanche and the White House worked in good faith to solve them, formally rescinding the fund, clarifying the scope of the release of claims has put this issue to bed once and for all,” Grassley said. 
Trump’s lawsuit has been sharply criticized because of the highly unusual way it was handled, with the president challenging an agency overseen by the executive branch he leads. 
A judge last month slammed the case as an improper exercise in self-dealing and referred one of Trump’s attorneys who filed it for potential disciplinary action. 
Blanche was an important figure for Trump’s defense 
Blanche, a former federal prosecutor and key member of Trump’s defense team as the Republican battled four indictments, arrived at the Justice Department last year as deputy attorney general. 
He was elevated to acting attorney general following Bondi’s failure to meet Trump’s demands to successfully prosecute his perceived political opponents. 
While Blanche insisted he wasn’t auditioning for the permanent post, he moved swiftly to accelerate investigations into Trump foes and advance other White House priorities, drawing condemnation from critics who say he has not shed his title as Trump’s personal lawyer. 
Shortly after Blanche took the top post, the Justice Department moved to indict longtime Trump adversary James Comey, the former FBI director, on charges of threatening the 47th president by posting a social media photograph of seashells in the numerical arrangement of “86 47.” 
Comey’s lawyers have accused the Justice Department of misleading judges, submitting documents containing false statements and withholding key facts to bring what the defense described as a politically motivated prosecution. 
Blanche separately appointed Joseph diGenova, a former Justice Department prosecutor from the Reagan administration, to oversee a Florida-based investigation into whether former law enforcement and intelligence officials conspired over the last decade to undermine Trump. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Confirmation Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.6%Baltimore Sun: 1.8%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 5.7%Baltimore Sun: 3.2%Framing Effect1.7%This article: 1.5%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Loss Aversion1.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Associated Press: 1.8%Baltimore Sun: 2.5%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 1.7%Associated Press: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Pessimism Bias1.7%This article: 17.4%Associated Press: 7.2%Baltimore Sun: 5.1%Negativity Bias17.4%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias2.5%This article: 7.5%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.6%Fundamental Attribution Error7.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.5%Baltimore Sun: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 1.4%Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Recency Bias1.4%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.5%Associated Press: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Appeal to Authority2.5%This article: 4.8%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%False Dilemma4.8%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.5%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.8%Associated Press: 2.1%Baltimore Sun: 2.3%Hasty Generalization4.8%This article: 7.5%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Red Herring7.5%This article: 2.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Bandwagon2.0%This article: 8.2%Associated Press: 3.7%Baltimore Sun: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 15.0%Associated Press: 2.0%Baltimore Sun: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.0%Associated Press: 0.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Burden of Proof7.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 2.6%Associated Press: 1.4%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Anecdotal2.6%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.5%Associated Press: 0.9%Baltimore Sun: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.5%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.0%Baltimore Sun: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.1%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 1.2%Baltimore Sun: 1.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.8%Baltimore Sun: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 2.4%Baltimore Sun: 2.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.6%Baltimore Sun: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.7%Baltimore Sun: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.2%Baltimore Sun: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Associated Press: 0.3%Baltimore Sun: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1073 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers20%attributed speech859writer words
Selected voice

Susan Collins

100%flagged-word coverage
43 attributed words20% of attributed speech50% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.