Keyword summary
63% 15 analyzed articles/videos 9,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Toronto results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 4,997 hits . Analysis detected 39,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,040 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,325 of 59,653 keywords). This Toronto is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Toronto
Keyword details
Total words: 56,040
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score15 analyzed articles56K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst