Author summary
94%1 analyzed article/video873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bhaven Moorthy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Indoctrination, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22.8% saturation with 795 hits. Analysis detected 2,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,492 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 70% (2,849 of 9,471 authors). This Bhaven Moorthy is worse (more manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group.
Bhaven Moorthy
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
70%Bhaven Moorthy (selected)4%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,492
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

70% percentile
025507510069.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.8%22.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Author 12.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Author 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos