Author summary
76% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Jones results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 7,252 hits . Analysis detected 34,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,384 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 42% (5,378 of 9,200 authors). This Chris Jones is better (less manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. Chris Jones
Author details
Total words: 36,384
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.5% percentile 2.0% BS Score10 analyzed articles36.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst