Keyword summary
86% 18 analyzed articles/videos 12,218 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Cook results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 3,181 hits . Analysis detected 39,261 faulty-reasoning hits from 47,988 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 23% (45,961 of 59,653 keywords). This Tim Cook is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Tim Cook
Keyword details
Total words: 47,988
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score18 analyzed articles48K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst