Author summary
85% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Pruner results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Framing Effect , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 2,281 hits . Analysis detected 9,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,556 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 60% (3,583 of 8,897 authors). This Aaron Pruner is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group. Aaron Pruner
Author details
Total words: 9,556
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 23.9% 23.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.5% 8.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 23.9%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.8%, sitewide 0.8% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst