Keyword summary
63% 20 analyzed articles/videos 13,569 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Solar Power results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 4,268 hits . Analysis detected 38,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 63,821 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (54,566 of 59,653 keywords). This Solar Power is better (less manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group. Solar Power
Keyword details
Total words: 63,821
Article count: 20
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.5% percentile 1.2% BS Score20 analyzed articles63.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst