Publication summary
84% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These SaportaReport results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 2,326 hits . Analysis detected 13,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,513 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 64% (213 of 584 publications). This SaportaReport is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 16,513
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 14.1% 14.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 9.2% 9.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst