Author summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Glesby results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 290 hits . Analysis detected 1,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,404 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 71% (2,830 of 9,471 authors). This Laura Glesby is worse (more manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Laura Glesby
Author details
Total words: 2,404
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Author 12.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst