Keyword summary
86% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Scare results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 5,111 hits . Analysis detected 35,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,140 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (30,623 of 57,401 keywords). This Red Scare is better (less manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group. Red Scare
Keyword details
Total words: 32,140
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles32.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst