Author summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,347 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liza Featherstone results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 2,763 hits . Analysis detected 16,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,628 of 9,481 authors). This Liza Featherstone is worse (more manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Liza Featherstone
Author details
Total words: 9,388
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.8% percentile 4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 29.4% 29.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.4% 23.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.6% 14.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.7% 14.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 29.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 14.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Author 4.7%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst