Keyword summary
88% 19 analyzed articles/videos 12,712 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Election results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 10,241 hits . Analysis detected 71,892 faulty-reasoning hits from 58,566 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (28,087 of 52,493 keywords). This Presidential Election is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group. Presidential Election
Keyword details
Total words: 58,566
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.5% percentile 2.3% BS Score19 analyzed articles58.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst