Keyword summary
93% 31 analyzed articles/videos 22,334 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pam Bondi results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 14,170 hits . Analysis detected 95,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 93,176 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 32% (36,420 of 52,989 keywords). This Pam Bondi is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group. Pam Bondi
Keyword details
Total words: 93,176
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.3% percentile 1.9% BS Score31 analyzed articles93.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst