BS Summary: This article contains 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Unattributed Quote, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 24% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 208 faulty-reasoning hits from 342 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of 20% (22,826 of 28,275 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.70% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON (AP)  President Donald Trump said Thursday he may withdraw and delay Todd Blanche’s nomination for the full-time post to avoid conceding to Senate Republicans’ demands over a sweeping tax audit immunity deal benefiting the president and members of his family. 
Hours after Trump’s post, however, Blanche held a meeting with Cornyn and Tillis and the two sides were back to working collaboratively, according to a person familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations around Blanche’s confirmation. 
“I think as far as Blanche and the Department of Justice, we were pretty much on the same page,” Cornyn said Thursday. 
“But then when the president got wind of it, he wasn’t willing to go along with it.” 
Cornyn and Tillis have said they won’t back Blanche’s nomination without additional assurances in writing about the settlement, which included a deal to drop tax claims against the president and a now-scrapped plan to create a $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” meant to compensate Trump allies. 
While the majority of Republican senators oppose the settlement, the main pushback to Blanche has come from Cornyn, who lost his seat earlier this year when Trump opposed him in a GOP primary. 
Trump has also frequently targeted Tillis, who announced last year that he would not run for re-election and has criticized the administration over the pardons of Jan. 6 rioters and other matters. 
Though it would be politically embarrassing for the Trump administration, pulling Blanche’s nomination would likely have little practical impact on the management of the Justice Department. 
Blanche, who took the reins of the department after Pam Bondi’s firing in April, can still lead the agency as either acting attorney general or deputy attorney general, the No. 2 post to which he was confirmed last year. 
The deputy attorney general, who oversees the day-to-day operations of the law enforcement agency, can perform the duties of the attorney general if that post is vacant. 
___ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.7%AP News: 1.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 2.3%AP News: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 2.6%AP News: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 24.0%Michelle L. Price: 9.4%AP News: 7.3%Framing Effect24.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 3.5%AP News: 2.1%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.7%AP News: 1.9%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 9.4%AP News: 8.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.8%AP News: 1.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.1%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error5.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.4%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.2%AP News: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.1%AP News: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.0%AP News: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.4%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.6%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem19.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 3.3%AP News: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.4%AP News: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.9%AP News: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.9%AP News: 2.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 4.1%AP News: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.5%AP News: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 2.4%AP News: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.7%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.3%AP News: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.4%AP News: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 12.9%Michelle L. Price: 4.2%AP News: 1.9%Unattributed Quote12.9%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 1.5%AP News: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 4.2%AP News: 2.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.4%AP News: 0.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.4%AP News: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Michelle L. Price: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

342 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker11%attributed speech303writer words
Selected voice

Cornyn

44%flagged-word coverage
39 attributed words100% of attributed speech63% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Unattributed Quote-14.5 ptsWriter: 14.5%Cornyn: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.