Keyword summary
90% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,651 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Presidential Center results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 4,278 hits . Analysis detected 34,898 faulty-reasoning hits from 38,451 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (41,660 of 59,521 keywords). This Obama Presidential Center is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Obama Presidential Center
Keyword details
Total words: 38,451
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score9 analyzed articles38.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst