Keyword summary
54% 21 analyzed articles/videos 18,116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Memphis results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 6,150 hits . Analysis detected 54,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 87,309 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (52,721 of 57,505 keywords). This Memphis is better (less manipulative) than 91.70% of the peer group. Memphis
Keyword details
Total words: 87,309
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.3% percentile 1.2% BS Score21 analyzed articles87.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst