Publication summary
27%9 analyzed articles/videos4,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military.com results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 632 hits. Analysis detected 7,359 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,578 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (392 of 584 publications). This Military.com is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Military.com
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Signal Cleveland1%
1%Montana Free Press1%
1%Just Security1%
1%Greenville News1%
33%Military.com (selected)2%
100%Utah Hockey Club10%
100%Lookout12%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
Publication details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
1.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.8%1.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Publication 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate