Author summary
62%4 analyzed articles/videos1,778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anthony Izaguirre results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 570 hits. Analysis detected 4,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,252 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (6,243 of 8,756 authors). This Anthony Izaguirre is better (less manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Anthony Izaguirre
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
29%Anthony Izaguirre (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,252
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

29% percentile
025507510028.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.8%3.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate