Publication summary
89% 39 analyzed articles/videos 25,477 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AP results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and In-Group Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 3,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,633 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (459 of 570 publications). This AP is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 13,633
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.5% percentile 0.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst