Author summary
8% 1 analyzed article/video 2,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarit Laschinsky results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 382 hits . Analysis detected 1,880 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 5% (8,862 of 9,286 authors). This Sarit Laschinsky is better (less manipulative) than 95.40% of the peer group. Sarit Laschinsky
Author details
Total words: 8,412
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.6% percentile 0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.3% Indoctrination: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Personal Incredulity: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Circular Reasoning: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst