Author summary
89%6 analyzed articles/videos6,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Brown results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 2,151 hits. Analysis detected 19,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,448 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 37% (5,679 of 8,897 authors). This Matt Brown is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Matt Brown
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
37%Matt Brown (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 21,448
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles21.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.0%10.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.7%9.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate