Author summary
15%1 analyzed article/video747 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lucas Finton results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 976 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (5,349 of 8,804 authors). This Lucas Finton is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Lucas Finton
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
40%Lucas Finton (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,988
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos