Keyword summary
68% 16 analyzed articles/videos 9,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Letitia James results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 4,326 hits . Analysis detected 34,732 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,308 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 26% (42,510 of 57,315 keywords). This Letitia James is better (less manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group. Letitia James
Keyword details
Total words: 40,308
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles40.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst