Author summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 815 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Davis Giangiulio results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 217 hits . Analysis detected 2,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,260 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 50% (4,394 of 8,706 authors). This Davis Giangiulio is better (less manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Davis Giangiulio
Author details
Total words: 3,260
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 6.7% 6.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.9%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst