Publication summary
60% 23 analyzed articles/videos 6,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These BKReader results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 2,212 hits . Analysis detected 18,208 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,650 analyzed words across 23 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 45% (302 of 548 publications). This BKReader is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 27,650
Article count: 23
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
45% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score23 analyzed articles27.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst