Keyword summary
65% 11 analyzed articles/videos 12,823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Criminal Court results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 7,582 hits . Analysis detected 50,100 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,020 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (41,682 of 59,656 keywords). This International Criminal Court is better (less manipulative) than 69.90% of the peer group. International Criminal Court
Keyword details
Total words: 54,020
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles54K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 29% 7/17/2026, 7:58:26 AM