Keyword summary
78% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,833 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Crackdown results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 4,187 hits . Analysis detected 33,852 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,154 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (50,685 of 59,316 keywords). This Immigration Crackdown is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Immigration Crackdown
Keyword details
Total words: 48,154
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles48.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst