Keyword summary
61% 87 analyzed articles/videos 67,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drones results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 24,087 hits . Analysis detected 236,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 313,085 analyzed words across 87 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 13% (44,687 of 51,385 keywords). This Drones is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Drones
Keyword details
Total words: 313,085
Article count: 87
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.0% percentile 1.4% BS Score87 analyzed articles313.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst