Author summary
85%7 analyzed articles/videos3,885 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hayward results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 2,207 hits. Analysis detected 17,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,540 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 57% (3,736 of 8,603 authors). This John Hayward is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
John Hayward
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
57%John Hayward (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,540
Article count: 7
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score7 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.6%8.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.2%14.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 5.7%5.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate