Keyword summary
80% 66 analyzed articles/videos 58,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 14,846 hits . Analysis detected 172,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 308,433 analyzed words across 66 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 5% (49,098 of 51,410 keywords). This Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group. Conservation
Keyword details
Total words: 308,433
Article count: 66
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.5% percentile 1.1% BS Score66 analyzed articles308.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst