Author summary
32% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dorany Pineda results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 618 hits . Analysis detected 3,272 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,280 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 25% (6,409 of 8,528 authors). This Dorany Pineda is better (less manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group. Dorany Pineda
Author details
Total words: 8,280
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst