Author summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 1,022 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harrison Tasoff for UCSB results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.4% saturation with 140 hits . Analysis detected 1,031 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,088 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,501 of 8,932 authors). This Harrison Tasoff for UCSB is better (less manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group. Harrison Tasoff for UCSB
Author details
Total words: 4,088
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
16% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst