Keyword summary
67% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,274 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cheating results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 3,104 hits . Analysis detected 28,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,214 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (39,345 of 53,809 keywords). This Cheating is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group. Cheating
Keyword details
Total words: 33,214
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles33.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst