Author summary
58%3 analyzed articles/videos1,828 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Van Buren results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 720 hits. Analysis detected 4,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,312 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 23% (6,644 of 8,524 authors). This Abigail Van Buren is better (less manipulative) than 77.90% of the peer group.
Abigail Van Buren
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
23%Abigail Van Buren (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,312
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

22% percentile
025507510022.1% percentile
1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 9.8%9.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.1%0.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 6.7%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate