Author summary
58% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,958 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catherina Gioino results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 2,394 hits . Analysis detected 23,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,832 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 24% (6,680 of 8,766 authors). This Catherina Gioino is better (less manipulative) than 76.20% of the peer group. Catherina Gioino
Author details
Total words: 31,832
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst