Author summary
43%3 analyzed articles/videos3,952 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nate Anderson results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 824 hits. Analysis detected 7,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,783 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (7,710 of 9,148 authors). This Nate Anderson is better (less manipulative) than 84.30% of the peer group.
Nate Anderson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
16%Nate Anderson (selected)2%
100%Bannon's WarRoom39%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 14,783
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

16% percentile
025507510015.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos