Keyword summary
66% 32 analyzed articles/videos 32,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Censorship results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 12,405 hits . Analysis detected 115,022 faulty-reasoning hits from 143,811 analyzed words across 32 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (47,155 of 58,290 keywords). This Censorship is better (less manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group. Censorship
Keyword details
Total words: 143,811
Article count: 32
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score32 analyzed articles143.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst