Author summary
15% 9 analyzed articles/videos 514 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Cardona results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 216 hits . Analysis detected 1,249 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,884 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 31% (6,371 of 9,145 authors). This Nina Cardona is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group. Nina Cardona
Author details
Total words: 2,884
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score9 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst