Keyword summary
94% 12 analyzed articles/videos 8,813 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abigail Spanberger results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 4,545 hits . Analysis detected 40,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,274 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 43% (33,703 of 58,511 keywords). This Abigail Spanberger is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Abigail Spanberger
Keyword details
Total words: 36,274
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst